Digital Pragmatic Analysis: Patterns of Students' Language Politeness in Interaction on Online Learning Platforms

Authors

  • Neneng Puspa Ratih Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Heny Friantary Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Vebby Andra Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30631/jmie.2026.111.11-18

Keywords:

Digital Literacy, Digital Pragmatics, Online Learning, Language Politeness, Student Interaction

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ language politeness patterns in online learning interactions and identify deviations and influencing factors within the perspective of digital pragmatics. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach focusing on communication phenomena in virtual learning environments. Data were collected through observations of student interactions on online learning platforms, interviews with teachers and students, and documentation of digital conversations. Data analysis used the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, including data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings revealed two dominant patterns of language politeness: positive politeness and negative politeness. Positive politeness was reflected through the use of inclusive, friendly, and solidarity-oriented language, while negative politeness appeared in polite requests and expressions of respect toward teacher authority. The study also found that low digital literacy, the dominance of social media communication culture, and the limited integration of digital ethics education significantly influenced students’ language behavior in online learning interactions.

References

Aminah, A., Hairida, H., & Hartoyo, A. (2022). Strengthening Students' Character Education through a Contextual Learning Approach in Elementary Schools. Journal of Basicedu, 6(5), 8349–8358. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3791

Andini, R. (2022). Digital pragmatic literacy in language learning. Journal of Language Education, 10(2), 120–130.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Student Library.

Halim, A., & Santoso, B. (2020). Communication ethics in online learning. Indonesian Journal of Education, 9(1), 45–56.

Herring, S. C. (2018). Digital discourse and interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 134, 1–10.

Lestari, D. (2025). Language politeness in students' digital communication. Journal of Modern Linguistics, 14(1), 25–40.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Pratiwi, D. (2021). Students' language styles in digital communication. Indonesian Journal of Linguistics, 39(1), 67–78.

Rahmawati, N. (2024). Integration of digital pragmatics in the Indonesian language curriculum. Journal of Modern Education, 12(1), 15–25.

Social, W. A. (2025). Digital trends and social media usage in Indonesia BT - Global Digital Report 2025.

Sugiyono. (2015). Educational Research Methods of Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Approaches Alphabet.

Susanto, H. (2023). Digital communication ethics in education. Journal of Educational Ethics, 5(2), 89–102.

Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-10

Issue

Section

Articles